skip to content

Faculty of Economics

Journal Cover

Block, J. I., Fudenberg, D. and Levine, D. K.

Learning dynamics with social comparisons and limited memory

Theoretical Economics

Vol. 14(1) pp. 135-172 (2019)

Abstract: We study models of learning in games where agents with limited memory use social information to decide when and how to change their play. When agents observe only the aggregate distribution of payoffs and recall only information from the last period, aggregate play comes close to Nash equilibrium for generic games, and pure equilibria are generally more stable than mixed equilibria. When agents observe both the payoff distribution of other agents and the actions that led to those payoffs, and can remember this for some time, the length of their memory plays a key role: With short memories, aggregate play may not come close to Nash equilibrium unless the game satisfies an acyclicity condition. When agents have sufficiently long memory, generically aggregate play comes close to Nash equilibrium. However, unlike in the model where social information is solely about how well other agents are doing, mixed equilibria can be favored over pure ones.

Keywords: Social learning, Nash equilibrium, best‐response dynamics, equilibrium selection

JEL Codes: C72, C73

Author links: Juan Block  

Publisher's Link: https://doi.org/10.3982/TE2626



Papers and Publications



Recent Publications


Jochmans, K., and Weidner, M. Fixed-Effect Regressions on Network Data Econometrica [2019]

Gagnon, J. and Goyal, S. Networks, markets and inequality American Economic Review [2017]

Mitchell, J., Robertson, D. and Wright, S. R² bounds for predictive models: what univariate properties tell us about multivariate predictability Journal of Business and Economic Statistics [2018]

Corsetti, G., Mavroeidi, E., Thwaites, G. and Wolf, M. Step away from the zero lower bound: small open economies in a world of secular stagnation Journal of International Economics [2019]