skip to content

Faculty of Economics

Journal Cover

Horrell, S. and Oxley, D.

Bargaining for basics? Inferring decision making in nineteenth-century British households from expenditure, diet, stature and death

European Review of Economic History

Vol. 17(2) pp. 147-170 (2013)

Abstract: Did the male breadwinner get more household resources, and if so, why? A dearth of direct information on intra-household processes makes it hard to answer. Instead reliance has to be placed on indirect evidence. Here, we investigate these processes more rigorously. We start by outlining theoretical models of household decision making (unitary, a particular variant of this, the impoverished unitary, and bargaining) and identify how gender bias in various outcomes might manifest itself under each of these scenarios. We then review a range of empirical results to ascertain if they indicate gender bias and how they accord with these alternative scenarios. In particular, we reconsider our own results which identified gender bias through econometric analysis of expenditure data, analyse household nutrition, refer to recent work which has indicated a differential impact of regional dietary patterns on the heights of men and women, report our findings on male and female body mass over the life

JEL Codes: N

Author links:

Publisher's Link:

Papers and Publications

Recent Publications

Onatski, A. and Wang, C. Spurious Factor Analysis Econometrica, forthcoming [2020]

Jochmans, K. and Weidner, M. Fixed-Effect Regressions on Network Data Econometrica [2019]

Giannitsarou, C., Kissler, S. and Toxvaerd, F. Waning Immunity and the Second Wave: Some Projections for SARS-CoV-2 American Economic Review: Insights, forthcoming [2021]

Vogt, M., Linton, O. Multiscale clustering of nonparametric regression curves Journal of Econometrics [2020]